A History Of Britain Pt1 Beginnings 3

well, a lot of them sort of got absorbed into british society.? they just sort of stayed.

There is however, no evidence that the natives "kicked them out", neither archeological, nor in writing or in any other way. Do not accuse those who stick to the evidence to be "romanophile" whilst you broadcast romantic, celtophile speculation. The evidence for the uprise of boudicca can be dated, rather exactly, so it? can't just be som saxon pillaging, theres a couple of hundred years between. There's much more evidence for a "romano-british" culture than there is for your "kicking out".

@ungface Rome never fell, per se, in Britain. It? packed up and went home

Its probably true to some extent when the roman empire was collapsing the furthrest reacs were most likely recieving less support form rome and were thus? easier for the natives to kick out.

why would tasidus write a speech that made the enemy seem so justified in there feelings???somebody help please?

I? guess the Romans confused the British with a bunch of cheese eating surrender monkeys.

yeah cos the battle of stirling bridge was only meant to have been between about 2000 men if that .over a stone slab that could only? fit 1 horse and cart at a time across a 5 foot burn ...i guess the winner does write history then .....propaganda is not a new sport lol ,,i can just imagine that the scribes would say the king had a million men to crush the barbarian hordes ...and that greek carry on were 300 stopped a couple of million hahahah yeah 300 backed by 10,000

when historians say an army of 40,000 was sent ,do they mean 40,000 warriors or 40,000 in the whole? train/convoy?

paz toy en tu profile d youtube muajaja adivina quien? soy!!

min 8:17 Calgacus speaks for all? of us who are? against tyranny and oppression, who hold the common law,? rule of law and the American Bill of Rights as supreme arbiters of men's freedoms.